<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Article for Parents About Online Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.internetsafety.com/2010/07/27/good-article-for-parents-about-online-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.internetsafety.com/2010/07/27/good-article-for-parents-about-online-safety/</link>
	<description>InternetSafety.com's blog for Internet safety news, product updates, and highlighting strategic partners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Article for Parents About Online Safety</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetsafety.com/2010/07/27/good-article-for-parents-about-online-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-16884</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Article for Parents About Online Safety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 14:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetsafety.com/?p=1063#comment-16884</guid>
		<description>[...] Great Article for Parents About Online Safety  By online guardian Posted &amp;#959n July 27th, 2010 b&amp;#1091 Stanley Holditch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Great Article for Parents About Online Safety  By online guardian Posted &amp;#959n July 27th, 2010 b&amp;#1091 Stanley Holditch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suricou Raven</title>
		<link>http://blog.internetsafety.com/2010/07/27/good-article-for-parents-about-online-safety/comment-page-1/#comment-16082</link>
		<dc:creator>Suricou Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.internetsafety.com/?p=1063#comment-16082</guid>
		<description>That depends what you mean by &#039;safe.&#039;

It is impossible to use the internet without, eventually, seeing something pornographic and/of disgusting. There are plenty of trolls who like to post it in random forums just as a prank. Right now there is a debate going on at xxxchurch on the subject of why classical art is never thought of as porn, and some very graphic classics are being discussed. Even with a filter, no filter can be perfect. So, if your definition of &#039;safe&#039; is safe from seeing porn, then that is a standard that can never be met.

What education can do is prepare someone to expect to find porn from time to time, and accept it as just a fact of life on the internet. The correct response is to simply ignore it.

Much the same goes for this &#039;cyberbullying.&#039; There&#039;s an old cliche bit of advise about real-world bullies that says they will stop if ignored. In the real world, it doesn&#039;t work: Ignore a bully and they will eventually give up, but not before trying harder to draw a response. Online, it works perfectly. The worst they can do is send insults and be annoying, and anyone who can&#039;t take some insults has no business being on the internet. Debates in political forums often end with someone being called a nazi.

The mistake of simply filtering is to demand a sanitized, child-safe internet. That cannot be done. It goes against the very nature of the internet. You can&#039;t give them a childrens&#039; internet, so just prepare them to deal with the adult one instead - with it&#039;s trolls, spam, viruses and randomly appearing porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends what you mean by &#8216;safe.&#8217;</p>
<p>It is impossible to use the internet without, eventually, seeing something pornographic and/of disgusting. There are plenty of trolls who like to post it in random forums just as a prank. Right now there is a debate going on at xxxchurch on the subject of why classical art is never thought of as porn, and some very graphic classics are being discussed. Even with a filter, no filter can be perfect. So, if your definition of &#8216;safe&#8217; is safe from seeing porn, then that is a standard that can never be met.</p>
<p>What education can do is prepare someone to expect to find porn from time to time, and accept it as just a fact of life on the internet. The correct response is to simply ignore it.</p>
<p>Much the same goes for this &#8216;cyberbullying.&#8217; There&#8217;s an old cliche bit of advise about real-world bullies that says they will stop if ignored. In the real world, it doesn&#8217;t work: Ignore a bully and they will eventually give up, but not before trying harder to draw a response. Online, it works perfectly. The worst they can do is send insults and be annoying, and anyone who can&#8217;t take some insults has no business being on the internet. Debates in political forums often end with someone being called a nazi.</p>
<p>The mistake of simply filtering is to demand a sanitized, child-safe internet. That cannot be done. It goes against the very nature of the internet. You can&#8217;t give them a childrens&#8217; internet, so just prepare them to deal with the adult one instead &#8211; with it&#8217;s trolls, spam, viruses and randomly appearing porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

